Audit trail on every review
Round review with version control
Document types supported
Global reviewer teams, any timezone
Unlike generic document collaboration tools adapted for pharma use, MphaR's platform is built from the ground up for Medical Affairs publication workflows — with every feature designed around the specific compliance, scientific accuracy, and multi-stakeholder governance requirements of abstract and manuscript review in regulated pharmaceutical organisations.
Inline Document Annotation
Reviewers annotate directly on the document — at the word, sentence, or section level — with comments, suggested revisions, and scientific queries captured precisely in context and attributed by reviewer.
Annotations exportable with full reviewer attribution for response tracking.
Multi-Round Review Management
Structure the review process across as many rounds as required — with each round producing a clean new version, a consolidated change log, and a clear record of which comments were addressed and how.
Round-by-round version comparison available for all stakeholders
Structured Approval Workflow
Define multi-stakeholder approval chains — Medical Affairs, regulatory review, legal, external authors — with configurable approval sequences, mandatory sign-offs, and automated escalation for overdue reviews.
Parallel and sequential approval configurations supported.
Version Control & Document History
Every version of every document is stored, accessible, and clearly labelled — with a complete history of changes, reviewer contributions, and approval decisions from first draft to final submission.
Full document lineage available to Medical Affairs and compliance teams at any time.
Deadline Management & Automated Reminders
Set congress submission deadlines, internal review milestones, and reviewer assignment deadlines — with automated reminders, escalation alerts, and a real-time deadline dashboard for programme managers.
Critical path tracking for time-sensitive congress submission windows.
Reviewer Assignment & Tracking
Assign reviewers by document type, therapeutic area, or review round — with real-time visibility into who has reviewed, who is pending, and what each reviewer's contribution has been at every stage.
Conflict-of-interest declarations can be built into reviewer onboarding workflow.
Discussion & Resolver Threads
Every annotation can spawn a threaded discussion between the reviewer, the author, and Medical Affairs — with comments resolved, responded to, or escalated within the platform, maintaining full context throughout.
Open and resolved comment status tracked with timestamp for audit purposes.
Review Templates by Document Type
Set congress submission deadlines, internal review milestones, and reviewer assignment deadlines — with automated reminders, escalation alerts, and a real-time deadline dashboard for programme managers.
Critical path tracking for time-sensitive congress submission windows.
Compliance, Security & Audit Export
A fully secure, role-based access environment with complete audit log export — providing Medical Affairs teams with a defensible, timestamped record of every review action for regulatory, governance, and publication ethics compliance.
GDPR-compliant with configurable data retention and access permissions.
Author or Medical Affairs coordinator submits the document — abstract, manuscript, poster, or report — with metadata, target congress or journal, and submission deadline assigned at upload.
Medical Affairs programme manager assigns reviewers by role and expertise — Medical Affairs, legal, regulatory, external authors — with individual deadlines and structured review templates assigned per reviewer.
Reviewers annotate the document inline, complete structured review templates, and raise queries or suggested changes — all captured with attribution, context, and timestamp in a single shared environment.
Authors revise against consolidated reviewer feedback — with a new version generated per round, all comments marked as addressed or escalated, and additional review rounds initiated as required until the document meets approval criteria.
Configured approval chain is completed — with each stakeholder's sign-off recorded and timestamped. The final approved document is archived with its complete review history, ready for submission and available for compliance audit at any time.
Structured review and approval of congress abstracts for submission to major medical conferences — with congress-specific deadline tracking, word-count monitoring, and multi-round reviewer coordination built in.
Congress-specific templates and submission guidelines
Word count and format compliance monitoring throughout review
Parallel reviewer assignments for rapid turnaround
Medical Affairs and regulatory sign-off workflow
Submission deadline critical path tracking and alerts
Full annotation and approval audit trail on every abstract
End-to-end review management for journal manuscript submissions — from initial Medical Affairs review through multi-round revision cycles, author collaboration, and final approval before journal submission.
Visual and scientific content review in a single environment
Congress-specific format and dimension compliance checking
Reviewer annotation on poster content and visual elements
Rapid review turnaround for tight congress submission windows
Medical Affairs and regulatory approval chain
Final poster archiving with complete review record
Collaborative review of scientific poster presentations for congress submission — with visual layout review, scientific content annotation, and integrated approval workflow for Medical Affairs compliance sign-off.
Congress-specific templates and submission guidelines
Word count and format compliance monitoring throughout review
Parallel reviewer assignments for rapid turnaround
Medical Affairs and regulatory sign-off workflow
Submission deadline critical path tracking and alerts
Full annotation and approval audit trail on every abstract
Structured internal review and approval of Medical Affairs reports — including advisory board output reports, MSL insight summaries, and KOL engagement programme reports — with full governance audit trail.
Configurable internal report templates by document type
Structured Medical Affairs leadership review and sign-off
Integration with advisory board and MSL programme outputs
Confidentiality and access permissions by reviewer role
Approval workflow aligned to internal governance requirements
Complete audit trail for regulatory and compliance purposes
Every document moves through a defined review workflow — with structured feedback forms, section-level annotation, and round-by-round version tracking ensuring scientific rigour and clarity at every stage.
Every reviewer action — annotation, comment, approval, rejection — is logged with timestamp and identity, creating a complete, exportable audit trail that meets pharmaceutical compliance and governance requirements.
Manage multiple review rounds seamlessly — with automated version control, clear change tracking between versions, and a single source of truth for the current document state at every stage.
Coordinate reviewers across Medical Affairs teams, legal, regulatory, and external authors — regardless of geography or time zone — in one unified, deadline-managed platform.
Structured workflows, parallel reviewer assignments, and automated deadline tracking eliminate the back-and-forth delays that extend traditional email-based review cycles by weeks.
Every annotation, approval, and version change is automatically logged with reviewer identity and timestamp — creating a complete, exportable compliance record without any manual documentation effort.
All reviewer comments, annotations, and suggested changes are captured, consolidated, and attributed to the correct reviewer in one place — nothing lost in email threads, shared drives, or conflicting document versions.
Abstracts, manuscripts, scientific posters, and internal medical review reports — all managed in the same structured environment, with document type-specific review templates and approval workflows.
Real-time data on which HCPs have watched which lectures, how much they've watched, and where they dropped off — enabling contentoptimisation and targeted follow-up.
Individual and aggregate scores across all knowledge assessments —identifying high-performing HCPs, common knowledge gaps, andcontent areas requiring revision or reinforcement.
Granular data on how much time HCPs spend on each content area, which resources they return to most, and overall engagement patterns across the programme.
Segment engagement and learning data by country, HCP specialty, seniority level, or custom cohort — enabling targeted analysis and regional programme reporting.
Complete records of all certificates issued, CME hours awarded, and assessment outcomes — fully exportable for compliance, governance, and accreditation reporting purposes.
Manage the full publication programme — abstract submissions, manuscript pipelines, poster presentations — in one structured platform with complete deadline oversight and reviewer coordination.
Ensure every scientific document meets Medical Affairs quality, accuracy, and compliance standards before submission — with structured review templates,mandatory sign-off workflows, and a complete audit trail.
Participate in the review process within the same platform as Medical Affairs — with role specific access, structured annotation templates, and a clear record of every regulatory and legal input for governance purposes.
Receive structured reviewer feedback in one place, respond to comments in context, and manage revision rounds —eliminating the confusion of multiple tracked-change documents and conflicting email feedback.
